To,
The Members
The Directors of your Company are pleased to present the Thirtieth
Annual Report on the business and operations of the Company together with the Audited
Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) for the Financial Year ended 31st
March, 2025.
1. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The Financial Performance of the Company (Standalone) for the year
ended 31st March, 2025 is summarized below:-
(Rs. in Crore)
Particulars |
Current Year ended 31.03.2025 |
Previous Year ended 31.03.2024 |
Net Revenue |
5462.16 |
6758.11 |
Add: Other operating income |
0.03 |
4.67 |
Add: Other Income |
244.11 |
388.22 |
Total Income |
5706.30 |
7151.00 |
Profit before Interest, Depreciation,
Exceptional items & Taxation |
2098.89 |
2624.57 |
Less : Finance Cost |
414.13 |
449.18 |
Less : Depreciation |
470.20 |
465.11 |
Add: Exceptional items (Net) |
- |
(797.05) |
Profit /(Loss) before Tax |
1214.56 |
913.23 |
Add: Tax expenses (Net) |
(403.83) |
(227.13) |
Profit after Tax/(Loss) |
810.73 |
686.10 |
(Less)/Add: Other Comprehensive Income |
0.02 |
0.15 |
Total Comprehensive Income |
810.75 |
686.25 |
2. COMPANY'S PLANTS AND OPERATIONS
The Company continued to be engaged in the business of thermal and
hydro power generation, coal mining and cement grinding. The company presently owns and
operates three Power plants with an aggregate capacity of 2220 MW, 2 MTPA Cement Grinding
Unit and 3.92 MTPA Captive Coal Mine as per details given below:-
(i) 400 MW Vishnuprayag Hydro-Electric Plant in the State of
Uttarakhand, which is in operation since October 2006.
(ii) 500 MW Jaypee Bina Thermal Power Plant in Distt. Sagar (M.P)
consisting of two units of 250 MW each, First unit has been in operation since August 2012
and second unit since April 2013.
(iii) 1320 MW Jaypee Nigrie Supercritical Thermal Power Plant (JNSTPP)
in Distt. Singrauli (M.P) consisting of two units of 660 MW each, First unit has been in
operation since September 2014 and second unit since February 2015.
(iv) Cement Grinding facility at Nigrie called Jaypee Nigrie
Cement Grinding Unit with an installed capacity of 2 MTPA.
(v) Amelia (North) Coal Mine in Distt. Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh, which
was acquired through e-auction in 2015 with annual capacity of 3.92 MTPA. Entire coal
produced by the said coal mine is being utilized for Power Generation at JNSTPP.
The Plant availability, Plant load factor and net saleable energy
generation of Hydro and Thermal Power Plants for the Financial Year 2024- 25 were as
under:-
Plant |
Plant Availability (%) |
Plant Load Factor (%) |
Net Saleable Energy Generation (MU) |
Jaypee Vishnuprayag Hydro Power Plant (400
MW) |
99.32 |
52.18 |
1,589.17 |
Jaypee Bina Thermal Power Plant (500 MW) |
82.61 |
68.64 |
2,716.82 |
Jaypee Nigrie Supercritical Thermal Power
Plant (1320 MW) |
90.41 |
80.93 |
8,675.00 |
The saleable energy generation for the year has been 12,980.99 MUs as
compared to 13,565.60 MUs during previous year i.e lower by 584.61 MUs. The performance of
various plants is given as under:-
2.1 400 MW Jaypee Vishnuprayag Hydro Electric Power
Plant
400 MW Jaypee Vishnuprayag Hydro Electric Power Plant is located at
District Chamoli, Uttarakhand. The Company has a PPA with Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation
Limited (UPPCL) to supply 88% of net power generated and the remaining 12% is supplied
free of cost to the Government of Uttarakhand.
The performance of the Vishnuprayag Hydro Electric Power Plant during
the year ended 31st March, 2025 has been higher than previous year due to hydrology.
During the year ended on 31st March, 2025 the energy generated was 1828.42 MUs as compared
to 1627.46 MUs during the corresponding previous year and the net saleable energy of
1589.17 MUs as against 1413.67 MUs during the previous year.
2.2 500 MW Jaypee Bina Thermal Power Plant
Jaypee Bina Thermal Power Plant (JBTPP) located at Village Sirchopi,
District Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, is a coal based thermal power plant having an installed
capacity of 500 MW (2X250 MW).
The Company has a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Madhya Pradesh
Power Management Company Ltd. (MPPMCL) to supply 65% of installed capacity at tariff
determined by MPERC and with Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) to supply 5% of actual
generation at variable cost which is also to be supplied to MPPMCL on behalf of (GoMP).
Thus the Plant supplies 70% of the installed capacity on long-term basis to MPPMCL in
terms of the Power Purchase Agreements executed with them and balance of installed
capacity is being sold as merchant power.
MPPMCL has been giving restricted schedule to BINA
TPP and is giving erratic and fluctuating schedules of dispatch most of
days & some time scheduling very low off take, which technically renders it unfeasible
to run the Plant optimally and forcing Company to sell balance power to power exchanges at
un-remunerative tariff. During FY 2024-2025, total 2,716.82 MUs power were delivered out
of which, 1,650.82 MUs were delivered to MPPMCL and balance 1,065.98 MUs were sold on
power exchange and on bilateral sale basis of which 216.73 MUs of power were sold, mainly
to meet technical minimum requirement of the plant.
The gross energy generation of JBTPP was 3,006.52 MUs during the year
2024-25 as compared to 3,328.97 MUs during the previous year, thus was lower by 322.45
MUs. The Company achieved a PLF of 68.64 % as compared to 75.80 % in the previous year.
As reported in previous year, the contract for Supply and Technical
Field Advisory Support of Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) was awarded to M/s. GE Power
India Ltd. on 30th March, 2024 for Rs.284.40 crores, in pursuance of which engineering
activities and some fabrication activities were taken up by M/s. GE Power. However, on
30th December, 2024, MoEF had issued an amendment with respect to the time line for
implementation of FGD and the revised time line is 31st December, 2029. Accordingly, a
Petition has been filed in MPERC for further direction on the process to be followed for
implementation in view of the revised time lines.
2.3 1320 MW Jaypee Nigrie Supercritical Thermal
Power Plant 1320 MW (2x660 MW) Coal based Jaypee Nigrie Supercritical Thermal Power
Plant is located in Nigrie village, Tehsil Sarai in Singrauli district of Madhya Pradesh.
The Plant has long term PPAs with MPPMCL to supply 30% of installed
capacity at tariff determined by MPERC guidelines and with GoMP to supply 7.5% of actual
generation at variable cost which is also to be supplied to MPPMCL on behalf of GoMP Part
of Energy generation is also sold on merchant basis through bilateral arrangements,
through Indian Energy Exchange (IEX), Hindustan Power Exchange (HPX) & Power Exchange
of India Limited (PXIL).
The gross energy generation of the Plant was 9357.73 MUs during the
year 2024-25 as compared to 9840.56 MUs in the previous year, which was lower by 482.83
MUs. During the year 2024-25, 5090.54 MUs power was sold as merchant sales. The Company
achieved a PLF of 80.93 % as compared to 84.87 % in the previous year.
As reported in previous year, the contract for supply of Flue Gas
Desulphurization (FGD) was awarded to M/s. GE Power India Ltd. on 30th March, 2024 for
Rs.490.50 crores, in pursuance of which engineering activities and some fabrication
activities were taken up by M/s. GE Power. However, on 30th December, 2024, MoEF had
issued an amendment with respect to the time line for implementation of FGD and the
revised time line is 31st December, 2029. Accordingly, a Petition has been filed in MPERC
for further direction on the process to be followed for implementation in view of the
revised time lines.
2.4 Coal Mining Operations
(i) Amelia (North) Coal Mine
Amelia (North) Coal Mine has been operating at its Peak Rated Capacity
(PRC) of 2.8 MTPA since 2015. Coal is being used for 2 x 660 MW Jaypee Nigrie Super
Thermal Power Plant, Nigrie, M.P Looking at the scenario of sustained shortage of coal,
the Ministry of Coal, Government of India, released a notification, wherein the production
capacity of coal mine can be enhanced up to 50% of the existing Peak Rated Capacity (PRC).
After obtaining Environmental Clearance on 7th February, 2024, the
company attained the PRC of 3.92 MTPA in FY 2023-24 and achieved same PRC in FY 2024-25
also.
(ii) Bandha North Coal Mine
The Ministry of Coal, Government of India has allowed commercial mining
of Coal on revenue sharing basis and under this scheme a partially explored Bandha North
Coal Block had been put on auction. Since this coal block is adjacent to Amelia (North)
Coal Mine and was to be operationally and strategically favourable, the Company
participated in the auction and the Coal Block was allocated to the Company for
exploration.
The Coal Block Development and Production Agreement was signed on 17th
October 2022 and allocation order issued on 12th December 2022. Since the coal block is
partially explored detailed exploration was carried out and Geological Report is under
preparation. Simultaneously preparation of mining plan has started to adhere to the
efficiency parameters of the CBDPA.
2.5 Jaypee Nigrie Cement Grinding Unit at Nigrie
(CGU)
2 MTPA Jaypee Nigrie Cement Grinding Unit at Nigrie, Distt. Singrauli
in Madhya Pradesh, started commercial operations w.e.f. 3rd June, 2015. There was no
production of Cement in the Plant during FY 2024-25 due to clinker supply constraints.
The Company is still exploring the ways to exit the noncore activity of
Cement Grinding.
3. OPERATIONS
The total income from operations for the year ended 31st March, 2025
aggregated to Rs. 5462.19 crore as compared to Rs. 6762.78 crore in the previous year i.e.
lower by Rs. 1300.59 crore.
The operation resulted in (profit before exceptional items, tax and
regulatory deferral account balances) for the year under review of Rs. 1214.56 crore as
compared to profit of Rs. 1710.28 crore in the previous year. Exceptional items for the
year under review was Nil against exceptional item which was Rs 797.05 in the previous
year.
The total income on consolidated basis for the year ended 31st March,
2025 aggregated to Rs. 5707.55 crore as compared to Rs. 7151.29 crore in the previous
year. However, Net profit after tax and exceptional items on consolidated basis during the
year under review stood at Rs. 813.55 crore as compared to net profit on consolidated
basis of Rs. 1021.95 crore during the previous year.
4. DIVIDEND
Due to non-availability of distributable profits in the current year,
dividend was not recommended by the Board. Pursuant to Regulation 43A of the SEBI (LODR)
Regulations, 2015, the Company has adopted the Dividend Distribution Policy, setting out
the broad principles for guiding the Board and the management in matters relating to
declaration and distribution of dividend. The Dividend Distribution Policy is available on
the website of the Company at https://www. jppowerventures.com/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/
JPVL_DIVIDEND-DISTRIBUTION-POLICYpdf.
5 TRANSFER TO RESERVES
No amount is proposed to be transferred to reserves.
6. SHARE CAPITAL
The Share Capital of the Company comprises of Equity and Preference
Share Capital.
(i) The paid up Equity Share Capital of the Company as on 31st March,
2025, was Rs. 6853,45,88,270 divided into 685,34,58,827 Equity Shares of Rs.10/- each out
of which, 24% Shares are held by Promoters and 17.52% are held by Banks, Financial
Institutions and Insurance Companies. The Company has not issued any fresh shares during
the year under review.
(ii) The Company also has Preference Shares issued to lenders pursuant
to Debt Resolution Plan and the Framework Agreement dated 18th April, 2019, detail of
which is as follows:-
(a) 0.01% Cumulative Compulsory Convertible
Preference Shares (CCCPs) aggregating to
Rs.3805.53 crore to lenders;
(b) 9.5% Cumulative Redeemable Preference
Shares (CRPs) of Rs.7.5 crore to be redeemed in 3 equal installments to
Union Bank of India (erstwhile Corporation Bank); and
(c) 9.5% Cumulative Redeemable Preference
Shares (CRPs) of Rs. 12.02 crore to be redeemed out of the sale
proceeds of Nigrie Cement Grinding Unit to Canara Bank.
Also, your Company has not issued any: o Shares with differential
rights
o Sweat equity shares
o Equity shares under Employees Stock Option
Scheme
7. DEPOSITS
During the year under review, the Company has not accepted any fixed
deposits within the meaning of Section 73 of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act")
read with the Companies (Acceptance of Deposit) Rules, 2014.
8. HOLDING & SUBSIDIARIES
As on 31st March, 2025, the Company had following wholly owned
subsidiaries:
i) Jaypee Arunachal Power Limited;
ii) Sangam Power Generation Company Limited;
iii) Jaypee Meghalaya Power Limited;
iv) Bina Mines and Supply Limited (Previously known as Bina Power and
Supply Limited)
The status of the projects implemented/being implemented through
aforesaid subsidiaries is as under:-
8.1 Jaypee Arunachal Power Limited
Jaypee Arunachal Power Limited (JAPL) was incorporated by the Company
as a wholly owned subsidiary of the company, to set up 2700 MW Lower Siang and 500 MW
Hirong H.E. Projects in the State of Arunachal Pradesh. Jaiprakash Power Ventures Limited
alongwith its Associates was to ultimately hold 89% of the Equity of JAPL and the balance
11% was to be held by the Government of Arunachal Pradesh.
The Company has equity investment of Rs. 228.72 crores in the project.
The project was initiated in FY 2008-09. Since then, there had been considerable delays in
obtaining different approvals for the project. In the meanwhile Ministry of Power GOI has
decided to implement these project by Public Sector Undertakings and allocated these
projects as per the order F.No.14- 15/16/2021-H.I(259535) dated 22.12.2021 as follows:-
1. Lower Siang HEP (2700 MW) to NHPC Ltd.
2. Hirong HEP (500MW) to NEEPCO
Further, there had been continuous reluctance on the part of the said
PSUs and the possibility of the project coming into effect has diminished, therefor, the
Company has written off the investment in the project.
8.2 Sangam Power Generation Company Limited Sangam Power Generation
Company Limited (SPGCL) was acquired by the Company from Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation
Limited (UPPCL) through competitive bidding process, for the implementation of 1320 MW (2
x 660 MW) Thermal Power Project (with permission to add one additional unit at 660 MW) in
Tehsil Karchana of District Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh.
SPGCL executed Deed of Conveyance with Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation
Limited (UPPCL) but the District Administration could not hand over physical possession of
land to SPGCL due to local villagers' agitation. As such, no physical activity could be
started on the ground. SPGCL has written to UPPCL and all procurers that the Power
Purchase Agreement is rendered void and cannot be enforced. As such, it was, inter-alia,
requested that Company's claims be settled amicably for closing the agreement(s). Due to
abnormal delay in resolving the matter by UPPCL, SPGCL has withdrawn all its undertakings
given to UPPCL and lodged a claim of Rs. 1,157.22 crore on them vide its letter no. SPGCL/
NOIDA/2018/01 dated 13.03.2018. Further SPGCL has filed a petition with Hon'ble Uttar
Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (UPERC) for release of performance bank
guarantee and payment of certain claims.
Hon'ble UPERC has concluded the hearing and vide order dated 28th June,
2019 has directed UPPCL as under:-
a) The Power Purchase Agreement dated 17th October, 2008 and Share
Purchase Agreement dated 23rd July, 2009 would stand terminated. As a consequence of
termination of Share Purchase
Agreement, the Respondent (UPPCL) shall become the owner of SPGCL.
b) Allowed reimbursement of actual expenses of Rs. 251.37 crores and
allowed simple interest @9% on Rs. 149.25 crores which include expenditure on Land,
Advances and Admin. Expenses.
c) The Respondent will immediately release the Bank Guarantee provided
by the Petitioner (SPGCL).
UPPCL and SPGCL had filed Appeals against the Order of UPERC with
APTEL. APTEL vide its Order dated 14.07.2021 has disallowed the Appeals and directed UPERC
for verification & payment of expenses allowed in its Order & release of
performance guarantees.
In terms of Order passed by APTEL, SPGCL has filed application with
UPERC for verification of expenses & payment of expenses with Interest and release of
performance guarantee.
UPPCL and SPGCL have filed Appeals with Supreme Court against the Order
passed by APTEL. Hon'ble Supreme Court has stayed the Order passed by APTEL and matter is
pending for final hearing.
An amount of Rs. 552.21 crore has been spent on the Project up to 31st
March, 2025.
During the financial year 2023-24, the Company had written off Rs.
330.25 crores out of the total investments made in the subsidiary.
8.3 Jaypee Meghalaya Power Limited
Jaypee Meghalaya Power Limited (JMPL) was incorporated by the Company
as a wholly owned subsidiary to implement 270MW Umngot HE Power Project and 450MW
Kynshi-II HE Power Project on BOOT (Build, Own, Operate and Transfer) basis.
Since then, efforts were made to operationalize the projects but
ultimately, both the above projects became inoperative due to reasons given below:
In respect of Umngot HE Power Project (270MW), since there was
opposition by the local people, State Government halted the project and advised that
Umngot HE Power Project would not be operationalized as per MoA till further orders. The
matter was being pursued with State Government for permission to resume the works. In the
meanwhile, the, State Government decided vide minutes of the meeting dated 22.04.2022 to
terminate the MOA and begun the process for re-allocation of this project through ICB
route to PSUs.
Further, in respect of Kynshi HE Project II (3X150MW) project, it was
been established that there were deposits of Uranium in the area of project. Therefore, it
became very difficult to obtain clearance from Ministry of Environment and Department of
Atomic Energy to move further in this respect. For the reason cited above, the Government
of Meghalaya declared this project as non-feasible and scraped the same.
As such, both the projects had become non-feasible, the Company wrote
off the investment made in the JMPL amounting to approx. Rs. 8.3 crores.
8.4 Bina Mines and Supply Limited
Company has extended its business in Aviation and purchased an Augusta
AW 109-E Helicopter from M/s. Himalayaputra Aviation Limited, New Delhi.
Company is in process of seeking Non Scheduled Operating Permit (NSOP)
approval from Ministry of Civil Aviation.
In this respect, necessary applications have been submitted to Ministry
of Civil Aviation seeking Non Scheduled Operating Permit (NSOP) approval.
The Company's advancement toward securing NSOP is as under:
The Pre-Application Meeting with the DGCA was completed during
the year 2024-2025, addressing the NOC from HQ DGCA for the local acquisition of the
helicopter. The required fees for the change of Certificate of Registration were
submitted, and the local acquisition permission is approved.
A formal meeting was held with the DGCA's directorate team after
all manuals for non-technical assessment were submitted.
The evaluation phase is currently underway, with the DGCA
reviewing various manuals, including the Flight Safety Manual, FSDS Manual, SMS Manual,
Operations Manual, MEL, AMP test flight schedule, weight schedule, Tech Log Book,
Passenger Briefing Card, Load & Trim Sheet, and CAME.
As the Airworks CAMO office is based in Bangalore, the
Accountable Manager and Nodal Officer will be visting the DGCA office there for the
initial technical evaluation of these documents. During this phase, the helicopter will be
grounded for approximately one and a half months to transfer its C of R of helicopter
VTJPS from Himalyaputra Aviation Ltd to Bina Mines and Supply Ltd.
Upon approval of the manuals, the DGCA will inspect the office
facilities and evaluate the employee strength at Bina Mines and Supply Ltd.
Once all phases are complete, the final certification phase will
begin, during which the DGCA team will conduct a proving flight on our helicopter, VTJPS,
for one hour. After the proving flight, the DGCA pilots will issue the NOC, and the
certification process will proceed at HQ DGCA, leading to the issuance of the NSOP with
the fees for which have already been paid.
9. REPORT ON PERFORMANCE OF SUBSIDIARIES
The performance and financial position of each of the subsidiaries of
the Company for the year ended 31st March, 2025 is attached in the prescribed format AOC-1
as set out in "Annexure-A" and forms part of this Report. In accordance with
Section 136 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Audited Financial Statements, including the
Consolidated Financial Statements and related information of the Company and Audited
Accounts of each of its subsidiaries, are available on the website
www.jppowerventures.com. These documents will also be available for inspection during
business hours at the Registered Office of your Company.
The Policy on Material Subsidiaries, as approved by the
Board of Directors, may be accessed on the Company's website at the
link: https://www.jppowerventures.com/ wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Policy-on-Material-
Subsidiaries.pdf
10. DIRECTORATE AND KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL
As on 31st March, 2025, your Company's Board had Ten Directors, out of
which six are Independent Director including two Women Independent Director.
As required under the Act and the SEBI Regulations, the Company has
constituted following Statutory Committees:-
Audit Committee
Nomination and Remuneration Committee
Stakeholders Relationship Committee
Risk Management Committee
Corporate Social Responsibility Committee
All the recommendations made by the Committees including the Audit
Committee, were accepted by the Board.
The details of Board and Committees composition, tenure of Directors,
date of meeting and other details are available in the Corporate Governance Report, which
forms part of the Annual Report.
10.1 Changes in the Board
Following changes occurred in the board of the Company during the year
under review:
a) Shri Sunil Kumar Sharma (DIN: 00008125) and Shri Suren Jain (DIN:
00011026) retired by rotation at the 29th Annual General Meeting held in 2024, being
eligible, were re-appointed.
b) Shri Sonam Bodh (DIN:06731687), Nominee Director ceased to be
Director from 9th July 2024 due to withdrawal of his nomination by the IDBI Bank Limited.
c) Shri Sunil Kumar Sharma (DIN: 00008125) was reappointment as a
Whole-time Director on the Board of the Company from 1st April, 2024 to 31st March, 2025.
d) Dr. Dinesh Kumar Likhi (DIN: 03552634) was reappointed as an
Independent Director on the Board of the Company for second consecutive term for 3 (three)
years with effect from 6th August, 2024 up to 5th August, 2027.
e) Shri Suren Jain (DIN: 00011026) was re-appointed as Managing
Director & CEO on the Board of the Company for a further period of 5 (five) years with
effect from 12th January, 2025 up to 11th January 2030.
f) Shri Praveen Kumar Singh (DIN: 00093039) was reappointed as a
Whole-Time Director on the Board of the Company for a further period of 5 (five) years
with effect from 12th August, 2024 up to 11th August, 2029.
g) Shri Pritesh Vinay, Non-Executive Director (DIN: 08868022) resigned
on 21st February 2025 from the board due to personal reasons.
h) Shri Rama Raman, Independent Director (DIN: 01120265) resigned on
12th March 2025 from the board due to personal reasons.
i) Professor Suresh Chandra Saxena (DIN: 02254387) was appointed, as an
Independent Director on the Board of the Company with effect from 21st March 2025 for a
period of 3 (Three) years with effect from 21st March 2025 to 20th March 2028.
j) Shri Manoj Gaur (DIN: 00008480) and Shri Praveen Kumar Singh (DIN:
00093039) shall retire by rotation at the ensuing Annual General Meeting and are eligible
and have offered themselves for reappointment.
10.2 Key Managerial Personnel
Shri Sunil Kumar Sharma (DIN: 00008125) continued to be Whole Time
Director as he was re-appointment as a Whole-time Director on the Board of the Company
from 1st April, 2025 to 31st March, 2027.
Shri Suren Jain (DIN: 00011026) continued to be Managing Director &
CEO of the Company.
Shri Praveen Kumar Singh (Din: 00093039) continued to be Whole Time
Director of the Company.
Shri R.K. Porwal, Chartered Accountant, continued to be CFO of the
Company.
Shri Mahesh Chaturvedi (FCS 3188) continued to be Company Secretary and
Compliance Officer of the Company.
10.3 Number of meetings of the Board of Directors
During the financial year 2024-25, five meetings of the Board of
Directors were held. The maximum time gap between two Board Meetings was not more than one
hundred and twenty (120) days. The details of date and attendance of the Directors at the
Board Meeting are given in Report on Corporate Governance which forms part of the Annual
Report.
10.4 Statement on declaration given by Independent Directors
The Independent Directors of your Company have confirmed that (a) they
meet the criteria of Independence as prescribed under Section 149 of the Act and
Regulation 16 of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations 2015, and (b) they are not aware of any
circumstance or situation, which could impair or impact their ability to discharge duties
with an objective independent judgment and without any external influence. Further, in the
opinion of the Board, the Independent Directors fulfill the conditions prescribed under
the SEBI (LODR) Regulations 2015 and are independent of the management of the Company. The
Independent Directors have also confirmed that they have complied with the Company's Code
of Conduct.
10.5 Nomination & Remuneration Policy
As per provisions of the SEBI (Listing Obligation and Disclosure
Requirement) (Amendment) Regulation, 2018, which had come into force w.e.f. 01.04.2019, in
line with the modifications, corresponding changes have been made in the Nomination and
Remuneration Policy of the Company by the Board on the recommendation of Nomination &
Remuneration Committee. The Policy was again reviewed on 1st May, 2025. The Nomination and
Remuneration Policy is available on our website at www. jppowerventures.com.
10.6 Annual evaluation of performance of the
Board, its Committees and Individual Directors
(i) Pursuant to provision of Section 178 (2) of the Companies Act,
2013, Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC) of the Board in its meeting held on 11th
May, 2019 had specified the manner for effective evaluation of performance of Board, its
Committees and individual Directors. Accordingly, NRC in its meeting held on 1st May, 2025
had carried out the evaluation of performance of Board, its Committees except NRC and that
of individual Directors on the basis of various attributes and parameters as well as in
accordance with Nomination and Remuneration Policy of the Company.
(ii) A meeting of Independent Directors was held on 10th March, 2025
without the attendance of NonIndependent Directors or any member of the Management, for
evaluation of performance of NonIndependent Directors and Board as a whole and the
Chairperson as well as to assess the quality, quantity & timeliness of information
between Company management and Board that was necessary for Board to effectively &
reasonably perform their duties.
(iii) As per para VIII (1) of the Schedule IV of the Companies Act,
2013 as well as Regulation 17(10) of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, the Board of Directors
in their meeting held on 1st May, 2025 evaluated the performance of the Board as a whole,
performance of the Nomination and Remuneration committee and also the performance of every
individual Director (including Independent Directors). The evaluation of Independent
Directors was done by the entire Board, excluding the Director being evaluated. Further,
as per the said Regulation 17(10) of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, the Board also
evaluated fulfilment of the criteria of independence and their independence from the
management.
11. DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
Pursuant to Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, the Directors to
the best of their knowledge and ability, confirm in respect of the Audited Annual Accounts
for the year ended 31st March, 2025 that:
a. in the preparation of the annual accounts, the applicable accounting
standards had been followed and that there were no material departures;
b. the Directors had, in consultation with the Statutory Auditors,
selected such accounting policies and applied them consistently and made judgments and
estimates that are reasonable and prudent so as to give a true and fair view of the state
of affairs of the Company for the year ended 31st March, 2025 and profit of the Company
for that period;
c. the Directors had taken proper and sufficient care for the
maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013 for safeguarding the assets of
the Company and for preventing and detecting fraud and other
irregularities;
d. the Directors had prepared the annual accounts on a going concern
basis;
e. the Directors had laid down proper internal financial controls to be
followed and that such internal financial controls were adequate and were operating
effectively; and
f. the Directors had devised proper systems to ensure compliance with
the provisions of all applicable laws and that such systems were adequate and operating
effectively.
12. AUDITORS
12.1 Statutory Auditors
The Board of Directors in its meeting held on 27th May, 2022 had, on
the recommendation of the Audit Committee, re-appointed M/s. Lodha & Co. LLP Chartered
Accountants as Auditors of the Company for a second term of 5 (five) consecutive years
from the conclusion of 27th Annual General Meeting till the conclusion of the 32nd Annual
General Meeting to be held in 2027 at such remuneration as may be fixed by the Board of
Directors of the Company from time to time.
12.2 Cost Auditors
M/s Sanjay Gupta & Associates, Cost Accountants (Firm Registration
No: 000212) were appointed to audit the Cost Records relating to "Power
Generation" of various plants of the Company and also for Cement Grinding Unit for
the Financial Year 2024-25. The Cost Audit Report for the Financial Year 2024-25 will be
filed within the due date.
For FY 2025-26, pursuant to the provisions of Section 148 of the
Companies Act, 2013 read with Notifications/ Circulars issued by the Ministry of Corporate
Affairs from time to time, the Board of Directors of the Company have, on the
recommendation of Audit Committee has appointed M/s. Sanjay Gupta & Associates, Cost
Accountants (Firm Registration No: 000212) as Cost Auditors of the Company for auditing
the Cost Records relating to "Power Generation" of various plants of the Company
and also for Cement Grinding Unit and a Resolution for ratification of their remuneration
has been included in the Notice of ensuing Annual General Meeting.
12.3 Secretarial Auditor
In pursuance of Section 204 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 9
of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, the
Board, on the recommendations of the Audit Committee, had appointed M/s. VLA &
Associates, Practicing Company Secretary to undertake the Secretarial Audit of the Company
for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2025.
Secretarial Audit Report for the Financial Year ended on 31st March,
2025, issued by M/s. VLA & Associates, Practicing Company Secretary, in Form MR-3
forms part of this report and marked as "Annexure-B".
The Secretarial Auditor has made observation in his Report which is
outlined in Para 20 of this Report.
The said report contains no qualification/observation except as
mentioned hereinabove requiring explanation or comments from Board under section 134(3)
(f) (ii) of the Companies Act, 2013.
In compliance with the Regulation 24 A of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015
and Section 204 of Companies Act, 2013, the Board of Directors, on the recommendations of
the Audit Committee, at their meeting held on 1st May, 2025, approved the appointment of
M/s. VLA & Associates, Practicing Company Secretary (CP No. 7622) as Secretarial
Auditor of the Company to hold office from Financial Year 2025-26 till 2029-30, at such
remuneration as may be decided by the Board.
13. AUDITORS' REPORT
The Directors wish to state that the Statutory Auditors of the Company
has given modified opinion on the Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the
year ended 31st March, 2025. The qualification in the Standalone Financial Statement and
management response to the aforesaid qualification is given as under:-
Auditors' Qualification |
Management's Reply |
1. (a) Note no. 44(e) regarding non provision
against corporate guarantee provided to lenders (SBI) of JAL. As stated in the note no.
44(e) of the audited standalone financial statements, on filing of the petition by a
commercial bank before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) bench at Allahabad,
Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) (the party to whom the company is an associate) has
been admitted into/for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) vide NCLT Order
dated 3rd June, 2024 and IRP was appointed. As stated in the said note, the Company had
given a corporate guarantee (CG) to State Bank of India (SBI) of USD 1,500 lakhs (31st
March, 2024 USD 1,500 Lakhs) [equivalent Rs. 123,915 lakhs, USD converted at the exchange
rate of Rs. 82.61 per USD] against loans granted by SBI to JAL. Also, during the earlier
year, the Company has received a legal demand cum recall notice from SBI for corporate
guarantee provided by the Company, however for the reasons as stated in the said note, the
Company has disputed the same and presently in process of discussion with SBI. Further as
stated, the SBI has filed a case for recovery in DRT-III at Delhi against JAL along with
other parties where Company has also been made a party as a corporate guarantor. |
In the opinion of the Management there
will be no material impact of the fair valuation of the following guarantee on the
financial result/ statement of affairs. Accordingly fair valuation is not being considered
and recorded in this financial statement. |
|
Corporate Guarantee of US$ 1,500 Lakhs in
favour of State Bank of India, Hong Kong branch for the credit facilities granted by
lenders to Jaiprakash Associates Limited (Party to whom the company is Associate). The
principal amount of loan outstanding of US$ 1,300 Lakhs (equivalent to Rs. 70,333 lakhs)
has been converted into rupee term loan by State Bank of India vide sanction letter dated
28th December, 2016. Subsequent to the accounting of the impact of "Framework
Agreement" (Framework Agreement with its lenders for debt restructuring in earlier
year), the Company had initiated process for the release of the guarantee provided to SBI.
However, further in response to their legal demand cum recall notice, the following has
been replied : |
|
Said Corporate Guarantee has no essence to
lodge/ invoke against any claim on or after 18.04.2019 (execution date of Framework
Agreement) since the same was to be released by the State Bank of India (@), being one of
the participant of the DRP as explained above (provisions of the Framework Agreement will
be apply mutatis mutandis) and accordingly sustainability of the Resolution Plan was
worked out without considering any liability on account of the said Corporate Guarantee on
the basis of Financial Projections duly approved by the Consortium of Lenders of JPVL
including SBI. |
Further, to that extent non-compliance of Ind
AS 113 as fair valuation has also not been carried out of stated CG. Also, drawn attention
to the note no. 44(e) read with note no. 47 where as stated in the said notes, there
was/is non -compliance of SEBI Circular dated April 17, 2014 (as also been pointed out by
the SEBI in its SCN/Order to the Company and its four directors, MD and CEO, and CFO). |
|
As stated in note no. 44(e) of the audited
standalone financial statements in the opinion of the management, pending claims of the
Company before IRP and the Company is in discussion with SBI for release of corporate
guarantee in view of the Framework Agreement, presently the impact (amount) is
unascertainable as stated in the said note. |
|
|
[(@) as stated in the note no. 44(e) SBI
has assigned its fund based claim outstanding due for JAL to the National Reconstruction
Company Limited] |
|
Presently Impact cannot be quantified. |
As stated in para (A) above, impact is
unascertainable in the opinion of the management. |
|
1 (B) As stated in para in (A) above, JAL has
been admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and IRP/ RP has been
appointed. We draw the attention to the note no. 51 [read with note no. 44(e)] of the
audited standalone financial statements that the 'Company has paid advance of Rs. 3,434
lakhs (net) to/for carrying out certain works/repairs under different contracts. Against
advance payment made to JAL, no provision has been made and as stated in the said note and
the Company has filed claims with RP for advance amount paid and other claims note no. 51
[read with note no. 44(e)] which are pending, hence presently in the opinion of the
management, amount in unascertainable and not been provided for. |
JAL is doing Civil Work and other works
for JPVL. It is also doing Coal Handling work at Jaypee Bina Thermal Power Plant. There is
regular recovery from JAL, during the current FY The Company has originally filed claim of
Rs. 4,841 lakhs (net). However, as on 31st March, 2025, balance in the account of JAL is
Rs. 3,434 lakhs (net). In the opinion of the Management, there are fair chances for
recovery of this amount and there is no Provision required for it. |
Matter stated in para (A) above had also been
qualified in our audit report on the standalone financial results/statements for the
quarter/year ended March 31, 2024 and limited review report for the preceding quarter
ended December 31, 2024. Matter stated in para (B) had also been qualified in our limited
review on the standalone financial results, for the preceding quarter ended December
31,2024. |
|
Statutory Auditors in their Report on Standalone Financial Statements
have made Emphasis on certain matters. The Management Reply thereto are as under:-
Auditors' Emphasis on matters |
Management's Reply |
a) Attention is invited to note no. 44(h)
of the audited standalone financial statements regarding dues of Rs. 46,026 lakhs being
the amount excess paid to the Company as assessed and estimated by the UPPCL as stated in
note including carrying cost (excess payment made to the Company towards income tax and
secondary energy charges for financial years 2007-08 to 2019-20 and 2014-15 to 2019-20
respectively) against which UPPCL has also hold back Rs. 34,063 lakhs (including carrying
cost of Rs. 17,165 lakhs up to March 31, 2025). As stated in the said note in the opinion
of the management, Company has credible case in its favour and disallowance made by the
UPPCL on account of income tax and secondary energy charges are not in line with the terms
of PPA signed with UPPCL. Accordingly, as stated in the said note, no provision against
the stated amount and carrying cost has been considered-necessary by the management at
this stage (note no. 44(h) of the audited standalone financial statements) and the amount
deducted / retained by UPPCL of amounting to Rs. 34,063 lakhs is shown as recoverable and
considered good by the management. |
Based on the legal opinion obtained by the
Company, the action of UPPCL is not as per the terms of the Power Purchase Agreement
(PPA), and the Company had filed a petition with Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory
Commission (UPERC) against UPPCL for the aforesaid recovery. UPERC vide its order dated
12th June, 2020 has disallowed the claims of the Company and upheld the recovery/proposed
recovery of excess payment made by UPPCL to company. |
|
The Company has filed an Appeal with
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) against the above stated Order of UPERC and the
appeal is pending hence no provision in these financial statements considered necessary
against the disallowances of income tax and secondary energy charges of Rs. 46,026 lakhs
including carrying cost, as mentioned above as Company believes that it has credible case
in its favour. |
b) As stated in note no. 48 (i) of the
audited standalone financial statements, no provision has been considered necessary by the
management against Entry Tax in respect of Unit- Nigrie STPP (including Nigrie Cement
Grinding Unit) amounting to Rs. 10,871 lakhs (March 31, 2024 Rs. 10,871 lakhs) and
interest thereon (impact unascertainable). In respect of the stated unit, receipts of
approval for extension of the time for eligibility for exemption from payment of entry tax
is pending from concerned authority, as stated in the said note, for which the company has
made representations before the concerned authority and management is confident for
favourable outcome. Against the above entry tax demand, till date of Rs. 6,685 lakhs (31st
March, 2024 Rs. 6,685 lakhs) has been deposited and shown as part of other noncurrent
assets which in the opinion of the management is good and recoverable. |
In respect of Nigrie Power and Cement
unit, entry tax of amounting to Rs. 10,871 lakhs (previous year Rs. 10,871 lakhs) and
interest thereon (impact unascertainable) not payable as the same, on receipts of approval
for extension of the time for eligibility of exemption from payment of Entry tax is
pending from concerned authority for approval, for which the company has made
representations before the concerned authority and management is confident for favourable
outcome. Against the above entry tax demand, till date of Rs. 6,685 lakhs (previous year
Rs. 6,685 lakhs) has been deposited which is in the opinion of the management good and
recoverable. |
c) As stated in note no. 59(a) & 59(c)
of the audited standalone financial statements regarding pending confirmations/
reconciliation of balances of certain secured [including interest recompense, note no 44
(g)] and unsecured borrowings, trade receivables and trade payables (including MSME
parties, CHAs and of Sub-contractor (read with note no. 54 of the audited standalone
financial statements) and others current financial liabilities (including capital
creditors), receivables/payables from/to related parties, loans & advances and
inventory lying with third parties/in transit. In this regard, as stated in the note,
internal control is being strengthened through process automation (including for as stated
in note no. 59(b) regarding of fuel procurement and consumption processes which are in
process of further strengthening). The management is confident that on
confirmation/reconciliation there will not be any material impact on the state of affairs
as stated in said notes. |
Management is in the process to
confirmations/ reconciliation of balances of certain secured and unsecured borrowings
(current & non-current), trade receivables and trade payables (including MSME parties)
and other current liabilities (financial/other) (including capital creditors and of
Sub-contractors, CHAs and receivables/payables from/to related parties), loans &
advances and inventory lying with third parties/in transit. In this regard, as stated in
the note, internal control is being strengthened through process automation (including for
fuel procurement and consumption processes which are in process of further strengthening).
The management is confident that on confirmation/reconciliation there will not be any
material impact on the state of affairs. |
d) (i) note no. 54(b) [read with note no.
54(a)] of the audited standalone financial statements regarding show cause/ demand notices
from DMG of Rs. 1,79,083 lakhs received by the Company for recovery against illegal
extraction and sale of sand and FIRs has also been filed by the DMG against the officials
of the Company, as sated in the said note. As stated in the said note, sand mining
Contracts were Sub-contracted on back- to back basis and Guarantees' provided by the
Sub-contractor to DMG had been released along with issuance of No due certificate'
by the DMG. Further, as stated in the note against the demand notices of DMG of Rs.
1,68,615 lakhs the Hon'ble High Court AP has granted stay. As stated in the said note and
the reasons explained by the management, the demands of DMG for alleged extraction and
sale of sand are without any cogent basis and also has been legally advised, in
view/opinion of the management there is no need to make any provision against stated
demands and there will be no impact on the state of affairs of the Company. |
The Contract(s) were expired prior to
31.03.2024. Balances of sub-contractor is subject to confirmation and reconciliation and
purchases, sale and inventory had been accounted for in earlier year based on details/
statement as made available by the sub-contractor/ DMG. As Contracts with Sub-contractor
were on back to back basis hence there will be no material impact, further based on
No Due Certificate' of DMG and as per the statement received from DMG, no amount are
/were remaining to be payable by the Company to DMG. The Company has challenged the demand
notices of DMG as subsequent to the expiry of Contracts period, the DMG had appointed
another party to carry out sand mining activities also there is no cogent basis for
raising the demand notice(s) on the Company by DMG. Further, based on legal opinion, the
Company has creditable case in its favour. Further, Hon'ble High Court of AP has granted
stay on appeals filed by the Company. |
(ii) As stated in note no. 54(b)(ii) of
the audited standalone financial statements read with note no. 54(a) , balance of
sub-contractor is subject to confirmation and reconciliation as on 31st March, 2025.
Further, as stated in the said note no. 7(b)(ii) purchases, sale and inventory were
accounted for based on details/statement as made available by the sub-contractor. As
stated, management believes that there will be no material impact on the profit for the
year and state of affairs of the Company, on final reconciliation/ confirmation. |
|
e) As stated in note no. 47 of the audited
standalone financial statements, the SEBI vide its Order dated 27th December 2024 imposed
penalty of Rs. 14 lakhs on the Company (on MD & CEO, CFO and four directors Rs. 40
lakhs) after completion of investigation on issues (post show cause notice) mainly related
with non-compliances of certain accounting standards/Ind AS etc. w.r.t. non carrying out
fair valuation of corporate guarantees (CG) provided by the Company (note no. 44(e) of the
audited standalone financial statements), non-provision against impairment of financial
assets etc. (investment) and non-compliance of SEBI circular no. CIR/CFO/POLICY
CELL/2/2014 dated April 17, 2014 (on revised Clause 49 of the Listing agreement to be
effective from October 01, 2014) read with SEBI Circular No. CIR/CFO /POLICY CELL/7/2014
dated September 15, 2014 (as amended) (circular on related party transactions). Against
the above stated Order of the SEBI for imposing penalty on the Company, the Company had
preferred an appeal before SEBI Appellate Tribunal (SAT), decision of which is awaited. In
opinion of management, there will not be material impact of above stated Order on the
state of affairs of the company and profit for the quarter/year ended 31st March, 2025 and
on the state of the affairs. |
In respect of investigation conducted by
the SEBI, the Company and its four Directors, MD and CEO and CFO had been served Show
Cause Notice (SCN) in earlier year under Rule 4(1) of SEBI (Procedure for holding inquiry
and imposing penalties), Rules, 1995 on issues related with alleged non-compliances of
certain accounting standards/Ind AS etc. for the financial years from 201213 to 2021-22.
Vide its order dated 27th December, 2024 SEBI has imposed the penalty of Rs. 14 lakhs on
the Company (and penalty of Rs. 40 lakhs on MD & CEO, CFO and four directors). |
|
In this regard, the management believes
that there was no non-compliances in past as full disclosure were made on the basis of the
then decision taken, and there will be no material impacts of this order on the state of
affairs the Company. |
|
The Company had preferred an appeal before
SEBI Appellate Tribunal (SAT) against the above referred SEBI Order, decision of which is
awaited. However, SAT vide its order dated 6th March, 2025, while admitting the Appeal,
was pleased to stay the recovery subject to deposit of 50% of penalty imposed by SEBI. The
50% penalty was deposited in time by all the noticees. |
Auditor's opinion is not modified in respect
of above stated matters in para (a) to (e). |
|
Further, the Statutory Auditors in their Report on Consolidated
Financial statements have made certain qualifications. The Management's Reply thereto are
as under:-
Auditors' Qualification |
Management's Reply |
1. (a) Note no. 43(e) regarding non provision
against corporate guarantee provided to lenders (SBI) of JAL. As stated in the note no.
43(e) of the audited consolidated financial statements, on filing of the petition by a
commercial bank before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) bench at Allahabad,
Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) (the party to whom the company is an associate) has
been admitted into/for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) vide NCLT Order
dated 3rd June, 2024 and IRP was appointed. As stated in the said note, the Company had
given a corporate guarantee (CG) to State Bank of India (SBI) of USD 1,500 lakhs (31st
March, 2024 USD 1,500 Lakhs) [equivalent Rs. 123,915 lakhs, USD converted at the exchange
rate of Rs. 82.61 per USD] against loans granted by SBI to JAL. Also, during the earlier
year, the Company has received a legal demand cum recall notice from SBI for corporate
guarantee provided by the Company, however for the reasons as stated in the said note, the
Company has disputed the same and presently in process of discussion with SBI. Further as
stated, the SBI has filed a case for recovery in DRT-NI at Delhi against JAL along with
other parties where Company has also been made a party as a corporate guarantor. |
In the opinion of the Management there
will be no material impact of the fair valuation of the following guarantee on the
financial result/ statement of affairs. Accordingly fair valuation is not being considered
and recorded in this financial statement. |
|
Corporate Guarantee of US$ 1,500 Lakhs in
favour of State Bank of India, Hong Kong branch for the credit facilities granted by
lenders to Jaiprakash Associates Limited (Party to whom the company is Associate). The
principal amount of loan outstanding of US$ 1,300 Lakhs (equivalent to Rs. 70,333 lakhs)
has been converted into rupee term loan by State Bank of India vide sanction letter dated
28th December, 2016. Subsequent to the accounting of the impact of "Framework
Agreement" (Framework Agreement with its lenders for debt restructuring in earlier
year), the Company had initiated process for the release of the guarantee provided to SBI.
However further in response to their legal demand cum recall notice, the following has
been replied: |
|
Said Corporate Guarantee has no essence to
lodge/ invoke against any claim on or after 18.04.2019 (execution date of Framework
Agreement) since the same was to be released by the State bank of India (@) as explained
above (provisions of the Framework Agreement will be apply mutatis mutandis) and
accordingly sustainability of the Resolution Plan was worked out without considering any
liability on account of the said Corporate Guarantee on the basis of Financial Projections
duly approved by the Consortium of Lenders of JPVL including SBI. |
Further, to that extent non-compliance of Ind
AS 113 as fair valuation has also not been carried out of stated CG. Also, drawn attention
to the note no. 43(e) read with note no. 45 where as stated in the said notes, there
was/is non -compliance of SEBI Circular dated April 17, 2014 (as also been pointed out by
the SEBI in its SCN/Order to the Company and its four directors, MD and CEO, and CFO). |
|
As stated in note no. 43(e) of the audited
consolidated financial statements in the opinion of the management, pending claims of the
Company before IRP and the Company is in discussion with SBI for release of corporate
guarantee in view of the Framework Agreement, presently the impact (amount) is
unascertainable as stated in the said note. |
[(@) as stated in the note no. 43(e) SBI
has assigned its fund based claim outstanding due for JAL to the National Reconstruction
Company Limited] Presently Impact cannot be quantified |
As stated in para (A) above, impact is
unascertainable in the opinion of the management. |
|
1. (B) As stated in para in (A) above, JAL
has been admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and IRP/ RP has been
appointed. We draw the attention to the note no. 53 read with note no. 43(e) of the
audited consolidated financial statements that the Company has paid advance of Rs. 3,434
lakhs (net) to/for carrying out certain works/repairs under different contracts. Against
advance payment made to JAL, no provision has been made and as stated in the said note and
the Company has filed claims with RP for advance amount paid and other claims [note no. 53
read with note no. 43(e)] which are pending, hence presently in the opinion of the
management, amount is unascertainable and not been provided for. |
JAL is doing Civil Work and other works
for JPVL. It is also doing Coal Handling work at Jaypee Bina Thermal Power Plant. There is
regular recovery from JAL, during the current FY The Company has originally filed claim of
Rs. 4,841 lakhs (net). However, as on 31st March,2025, balance in the account of JAL is
Rs. 3,434 lakhs (net). In the opinion of the Management, there are fair chances for
recovery of this amount and there is no Provision required for it. |
Matter stated in para (A) above had also been
qualified in our audit report on the consolidated financial results /statements for the
quarter/year ended March 31,2024 and limited review report for the preceding quarter ended
December 31, 2024. Matter stated in para (B) had also been qualified in our limited review
on the consolidated financial results, for the preceding quarter ended December 31,2024. |
|
Statutory Auditors in their Report on Consolidated Financial statements
have made Emphasis on certain matters. The Management Reply thereto are as under:-
Auditors' emphasis on matters |
Management's reply |
a) Attention is invited to note no. 43(h) of
the audited consolidated financial statements regarding dues of Rs. 46,026 lakhs being the
amount excess paid to the Company as assessed and estimated by the UPPCL as stated in note
including carrying cost (excess payment made to the Company towards income tax and
secondary energy charges for financial years 2007-08 to 2019-20 and 2014-15 to 2019-20
respectively) against which UPPCL has also hold back Rs. 34,063 lakhs (including carrying
cost of Rs. 17,165 lakhs up to March 31,2025). As stated in the said note in the opinion
of the management, Company has credible case in its favour and disallowance made by the
UPPCL on account of income tax and secondary energy charges are not in line with the terms
of PPA signed with UPPCL. Accordingly, as stated in the said note, no provision against
the stated amount and carrying cost has been considered necessary by the management at
this stage [note no. 43(h) of the audited consolidated financial statements] and the
amount deducted / retained by UPPCL of amounting to Rs. 34,063 lakhs is shown as
recoverable and considered good by the management. |
Based on the legal opinion obtained by the
Company, the action of UPPCL is not as per the terms of the power purchase agreement
(PPA), and the Company had filed a petition with Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory
Commission (UPERC) against UPPCL for the aforesaid recovery. UPERC vide its order dated
12th June,2020 has disallowed the claims of the Company and upheld the recovery/proposed
recovery of excess payment made by UPPCL to company. |
|
The Company has filed an Appeal with
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) against the above stated Order of UPERC and the
appeal is pending hence no provision in these financial statements considered necessary
against the disallowances of income tax and secondary energy charges of Rs. 46,026 lakhs
including carrying cost, as mentioned above as Company believes that it has credible case
in its favour. |
b) As stated in note no. 46 (i) of the
audited consolidated financial statements, no provision has been considered necessary by
the management against Entry Tax in respect of Unit- Nigrie STPP (including Nigrie Cement
Grinding Unit) amounting to Rs. 10,871 lakhs (March 31, 2024 Rs. 10,871 lakhs) and
interest thereon (impact unascertainable). In respect of the stated unit, receipts of
approval for extension of the time for eligibility for exemption from payment of entry tax
is pending from concerned authority, as stated in the said note, for which the company has
made representations before the concerned authority and management is confident for
favourable outcome. Against the above entry tax demand, till date of Rs. 6,685 lakhs (31st
March, 2024 Rs. 6,685 lakhs) has been deposited and shown as part of other non-current
assets which in the opinion of the management is good and recoverable. |
In respect of Nigrie Power and Cement
Grinding Unit, entry tax of amounting to Rs. 10,871 lakhs (previous year Rs. 10,871 lakhs)
and interest thereon (impact unascertainable) not payable as the same, on receipts of
approval for extension of the time for eligibility of exemption from payment of Entry tax
is pending from concerned authority for approval, for which the company has made
representations before the concerned authority and management is confident for favourable
outcome. Against the above entry tax demand, till date of Rs.6,685 lakhs (previous year
Rs. 6,685 lakhs) has been deposited which is in the opinion of the management good and
recoverable. |
c) As stated in note no. 57(a) & 57(c) of
the audited consolidated financial statements regarding pending confirmations/
reconciliation of balances of certain secured [including interest recompense, note no.43
(g)] and unsecured borrowings, trade receivables and trade payables (including MSME
parties, CHAs and of Sub-contractor [read with note no. 49 of the audited consolidated
financial statements] and others current financial liabilities (including capital
creditors), receivables/payables from/to related parties, loans & advances and
inventory lying with third parties/in transit. In this regard, as stated in the note,
internal control is being strengthened through process automation (including for as stated
in note no. 57(b) regarding of fuel procurement and consumption processes which are in
process of further strengthening). The management is confident that on
confirmation/reconciliation there will not be any material impact on the state of affairs
as stated in said notes. |
Management is in the process to
confirmations/ reconciliation of balances of certain secured and unsecured borrowings
(current & non-current), trade receivables and trade payables (including MSME parties)
and other current liabilities (financial/other) (including capital creditors and of
Sub-contractors, CHAs and receivables/payables from/to related parties), loans &
advances and inventory lying with third parties/in transit. In this regard, as stated in
the note, internal control is being strengthened through process automation (including for
fuel procurement and consumption processes which are in process of further strengthening).
The management is confident that on confirmation /reconciliation there will not be any
material impact on the state of affairs. |
d) (i) note no. 49(b) [ read with note no.
49(a)] of the audited consolidated financial statements regarding show cause/ demand
notices from DMG of Rs. 1,79,083 lakhs received by the Company for recovery against
illegal extraction and sale of sand and FIRs has also been filed by the DMG against the
officials of the Company, as sated in the said note. As stated in the said note, sand
mining Contracts were Sub-contracted on back- to back basis and Guarantees' provided
by the Subcontractor to DMG had been released along with issuance of No due
certificate' by the DMG. Further, as stated in the note against the demand notices of DMG
of Rs. 1,68,615 lakhs the Hon'ble High Court AP has granted stay. As stated in the said
note and the reasons explained by the management, the demands of DMG for alleged
extraction and sale of sand are without any cogent basis and also has been legally
advised, in view/opinion of the management there is no need to make any provision against
stated demands and there will be no impact on the state of affairs of the Company. |
The Contract(s) were expired prior to
31.03.2024. Balances of sub-contractor is subject to confirmation and reconciliation and
purchases, sale and inventory had been accounted for in earlier year based on
details/statement as made available by the sub-contractor/ DMG. As Contracts with
Sub-contractor were on back to back basis hence there will be no material impact, further
based on No due certificate' of DMG and as per the statement received from DMG, no
amount are /were remaining to be payable by the Company to DMG. The Company has challenged
the demand notices of DMG as subsequent to the expiry of Contracts period, the DMG had
appointed another party to carry out sand mining activities also there is no cogent basis
for raising the demand notice(s) on the Company by DMG. Further, based on legal opinion,
the Company has creditable case in its favour. Further, Hon'ble High Court of AP has
granted stay on appeals filed by the Company. |
(ii) As stated in note no. 49(b)(ii) of the
audited consolidated financial statements read with note no. 49(a), balance of
subcontractor is subject to confirmation and reconciliation as on 31st March, 2025.
Further, as stated in the said note no. 7(b)(ii) purchases, sale and inventory were
accounted for based on details/statement as made available by the subcontractor. As
stated, management believes that there will be no material impact on the profit for the
year and state of affairs of the Company, on final reconciliation/ confirmation |
|
e) As stated in note no. 45 of the audited
consolidated financial statements, the SEBI vide its Order dated 27th December 2024
imposed penalty of Rs. 14 lakhs on the Company (on MD & CEO, CFO and four directors
Rs. 40 lakhs) after completion of investigation on issues (post show cause notice) mainly
related with non-compliances of certain accounting standards/Ind AS etc. w.r.t. non
carrying out fair valuation of corporate guarantees (CG) provided by the Company [note no.
43(e) of the audited consolidated financial statements], non-provision against impairment
of financial assets etc. (investment)and non-compliance of SEBI circular no.
CIR/CFO/POLICY CELL/2/2014 dated April 17, 2014 (on revised Clause 49 of the Listing
agreement to be effective from October 01, 2014) read with SEBI Circular No. CIR/ CFO
/POLICY CELL/7/2014 dated September 15, 2014 (as amended) (circular on related party
transactions). Against the above stated Order of the SEBI for imposing penalty on the
Company, the Company had preferred an appeal before SEBI Appellate Tribunal (SAT),
decision of which is awaited. In opinion of management, there will not be material impact
of above stated Order on the state of affairs of the company and profit for the year ended
31st March, 2025 and on the state of the affairs. |
In respect of investigation conducted by
the SEBI, the Company and its four Directors, MD and CEO and CFO had been served Show
Cause Notice (SCN) in earlier year under Rule 4(1) of SEBI (Procedure for holding inquiry
and imposing penalties), Rules, 1995 on issues related with alleged non-compliances of
certain accounting standards/ Ind AS etc. for the financial years from 2012-13 to 202122.
Vide its order dated 27th December, 2024 SEBI has imposed the penalty of Rs. 14 lakhs on
the Company (and penalty of Rs. 40 lakhs on MD & CEO, CFO and four directors). |
|
In this regard, the management believes
that there was no non-compliances in past as full disclosure were made on the basis of the
then decision taken, and there will be no material impacts of this order on the state of
affairs the Company. |
|
The Company had preferred an appeal before
SEBI Appellate Tribunal (SAT) against the above referred SEBI Order, decision of which is
awaited. However, SAT vide its order dated 6th March, 2025, while admitting the Appeal,
was pleased to stay the recovery subject to deposit of 50% of penalty imposed by SEBI. The
50% penalty was deposited in time by all the noticees. |
Auditor's opinion is not modified in respect
of above stated matters in para (a) to (e) |
|
f) Uncertainty on the going concern - of
Subsidiary Companies: |
(i) Financial statement of JAPL have been
prepared by the management of JAPL as going concern basis on account of continuing support
from holding company. |
(i) Jaypee Arunachal Power Limited: Jaypee
Arunachal Power Limited (JAPL) (where Holding Company has investment of Rs. 22,872 lakhs
and impairment provision made there against is Rs. 22,871 lakhs). The auditors of JAPL has
drawn the attention, in their audit report about erosion in the net worth of the JAPL
without modifying their opinion, on preparation of financial statements by the management
of JAPL as going concern basis on account of continuing support from holding company.
These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast
significant doubt about the JAPL's ability to continue as a going concern. However, the
financial statements/results of the JAPL have been prepared by the management on a going
concern basis Note no. 64(a) of the audited consolidated financial statements. |
|
(ii) Jaypee Meghalaya Power Limited: Jaypee
Meghalaya Power Limited (JMPL)'s (where Holding Company has investment of Rs. 846 lakhs
and impairment provision made there against Rs. 846 lakhs) accumulated losses have eroded
more than 50% of the net worth of the JMPL and JMPL is dependent on its holding company
for its daily operations. These conditions indicate the existence of a material
uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about the JMPL's ability to continue as a
going concern on which auditors of JMPL has drawn attention. The auditors has not modified
the opinion in their audit report. However, the financial statements/results of the JMPL
have been prepared by the management on a going concern basis [Note no. 64(b) of the
audited consolidated financial statements]. |
(ii) Financial statement of JMPL have been
prepared by the management of JMPL as going concern basis on account of continuing support
from holding company. |
(iii) Sangam Power Generation Company
Limited: Sangam Power Generation Company Limited (SPGCL) (where Holding Company investment
of Rs. 55,212 lakhs and impairment provision made there against Rs. 33,025 lakhs) is
having accumulated losses and its net worth has been significantly eroded as on 31st March
2025 and its claim against UPPCL is pending before Hon'ble Supreme Court. These conditions
indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about the
SPGCL's ability to continue as a going concern on which auditors of SPGCL have drawn
attention. The auditors has not modified the opinion in their audit report. However, the
financial statements have been prepared on going concern basis [Note no. 64(d) of the
audited consolidated financial statements]. |
(iii) Financial statement of SPGCL have
been prepared by the management of SPGCL as going concern basis on account of continuing
support from holding company. |
Auditor's opinion is not modified in respect
of above stated matters in f (i) to (iii). |
|
14. DETAILS OF FRAUD REPORTABLE BY AUDITOR.
During the year under review, neither the statutory auditors nor the
secretarial auditors of the Company has disclosed any instance of fraud committed in the
Company by its officers or employees required to be disclosed in terms of Section 143(12)
of the Companies Act, 2013.
15. COMMISSION TO MANAGING DIRECTOR OR WHOLE TIME DIRECTORS OF THE
COMPANY FROM ANY OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES.
Neither the Managing Director nor any of the Whole time Directors of
the Company received any remuneration or commission from any of its subsidiaries required
to be disclosed in terms of Section 197(14) of the Companies Act, 2013.
16. DISCLOSURE UNDER THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT THE WORK PLACE
(PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013.
The Company has in place an Anti- Sexual Harassment Policy in line with
the requirements of The Sexual Harassment of Women at the Work Place (Prevention,
Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 and rules made thereunder. An Internal Complaints
Committee (ICC) is in place as per the requirements of the said Act to redress complaints
received regarding sexual harassment. All women employees (permanent, contractual,
temporary, trainees) are covered under this policy.
Pursuant to Section 134(3)(q) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule
8(5)(x) of Companies (Accounts) Rules,2014, no case has been reported during the year
under review.
17. DETAIL OF APPLICATIONS / PROCEEDINGS UNDER
INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016.
During the year under review, pursuant to Section 134(3) (q) of the
Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 8(5) (xi) of Companies (Accounts) Rules,2014, there was
no applications / proceedings under insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016 has been
initiated against the Company
18. THE DETAILS OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AMOUNT OF THE VALUATION DONE AT
THE TIME OF ONE TIME SETTLEMENT (OTS) AND THE VALUATION DONE WHILE TAKING LOAN.
Pursuant to Section 134(3)(q) of the Companies Act read with Rule
8(5)(xii) of Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, the Company has not made any OTS with the
banks / financial institutions during the year under review, hence, no valuation was done.
19. PARTICULARS OF CONTRACTS OR ARRANGEMENTS WITH RELATED PARTIES
All Related Party Transactions were done on an arm's length basis and
in the ordinary course of business. During the year, the Company has not entered into any
contract/ arrangement/ transaction with related parties which could be considered material
in accordance with the policy of the Company on materiality of related party transaction.
The Board of Directors of the Company has reviewed the Policy on
Related Party Transactions on 1st February, 2025 and amended pursuant to the SEBI
Notification No. SEBI/ LAD-NRO/GN/2024/218 dated 12th December 2024 vide SEBI (LODR)(3rd
Amendment) Regulations, 2024. The amended policy on Related Party Transactions, as
approved by the Board, may be accessed on the Company's website at the link:
https://www.jppowerventures.com/wp- content/uploads/2025/02/Related-Party-Transaction-
Policy.pdf
The details of Related Party Transactions, as required under Indian
Accounting Standard-24 (Ind AS-24), are provided in the accompanying Financial Statements
forming part of this Annual Report. Form AOC-2 pursuant to Section 134 (3)(h) of the
Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 8(2) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 is set out
as "Annexure-C" to this Report.
20. SIGNIFICANT AND MATERIAL ORDERS PASSED BY THE REGULATORS OR COURTS
OR TRIBUNALS
In respect of investigation conducted by the SEBI, the Company and its
four Directors (including one ex- whole time Director), MD and CEO and CFO had been served
Show Cause Notice (SCN) in earlier year under Rule 4(1) of SEBI (Procedure for holding
inquiry and imposing penalties), Rules, 1995 on issues related with alleged noncompliances
of certain accounting standards/ Ind AS etc. for the financial years from 2012-13 to
2021-22. Vide its order dated 27th December, 2024 SEBI has imposed the penalty of Rs. 14
lakhs on the Company (excluding penalty of Rs. 40 lakhs imposed on MD & CEO, CFO and
four Directors (including one ex- whole time Director)). In this regard, the management
believes that there was no non-compliances in past as full disclosure were made on the
basis of, the then decision taken, and there will be no material impacts of this order on
the state of affairs the Company. The Company had preferred an appeal before SEBI
Appellate Tribunal (SAT) against the above referred SEBI Order, decision of which is
awaited. However, SAT vide its order dated 6th March, 2025 was pleased to stay the
recovery subject to deposit of 50% of penalty imposed by SEBI. The 50% penalty was
deposited in time by all the noticees.
21. EXTRACT OF ANNUAL RETURN
Pursuant to Section 92(3) read with section 134(3)(a) of the Companies
Act, 2013, copies of the Annual Returns of the Company prepared in accordance with Section
92(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 11 of the Companies (Management and
Administration) Rules, 2014 are placed on the website of the Company and is accessible at
the web-link: https://www.jppowerventures.com/wp- content/uploads/2025/05/MGT_7-2025.pdf
22. PARTICULARS OF LOANS, INVESTMENTS, GUARANTEES
AND SECURITY
The provisions of Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013, with respect
to a loan, guarantee or security is not applicable to the Company for being engaged in
providing infrastructural facilities as specified in Schedule VI appended to the Act.
However, particulars of loans given, guarantees given and securities provided and
investments made under the provisions of Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 are given
in the Notes to the Financial Statements.
23. COMPLIANCE WITH SECRETARIAL STANDARDS
The Company is in compliance with the applicable Secretarial Standards
issued by the Institute of Company Secretaries of India and approved by the Central
Government under Section 118(10) of the Act.
24. RISK MANAGEMENT
The Provisions of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 for constitution of
Risk Management Committee is applicable on top thousand (1000) listed entities on the
basis of market capitalization. Since the Company falls within top 500 listed entities,
accordingly, the Company has constituted the Risk Management Committee details of which
are given in the Corporate Governance Report forming part of the Annual Report.
The policy on Risk Management as approved by board is available on
company's website at https:// jppowerventures.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/
RISK-MANAGEMENT-POLICY.pdf
In the opinion of the Board, there is no risk which may threaten the
existence of the Company as a going concern.
25. BUSINESS RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
REPORT
In terms of Regulation 34 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations 2015, the Company
falls within top Five Hundred (500) listed entities based on market capitalization as on
31st March, 2025, as such, a Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) is
annexed with the Annual Report.
26. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
The Company has constituted Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Committee and has framed a CSR Policy. Corporate Social Responsibility Policy is available
on our website at https://jppowerventures.com/wp-
content/uploads/2024/05/CSR-Policy_May24.pdf. The brief details of CSR Committee are
provided in the Report on Corporate Governance. The Annual Report on CSR activities as
required to be given under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 8 of the
Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 as amended is annexed
herewith as "Annexure-D".
27. PARTICULARS OF ENERGY CONSERVATION, TECHNOLOGY ABSORPTION AND
FOREIGN EXCHANGE EARNINGS AND OUTGO
The information on conservation of energy, technology absorption and
foreign exchange earnings and outgo stipulated under Section 134(3)(m) of the Companies
Act, 2013 read with Rule 8 of The Companies (Accounts)
Second Amendment Rules, 2015 (As per notification dated 4th September,
2015), is annexed to this Report as "Annexure-E".
28. MATERIAL CHANGES AND COMMITMENTS
The Board wishes to mention the following material developments which
took place after the closure of Financial Year:
On 3rd June, 2024, the Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad
Bench, has admitted Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) (the Promoter Company of the
Company, which holds 24% stake in the Company) in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
(CIRP) and appointment of Interim Resolution Professional under Section 7 of the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Further developments in regard to the process are
available in the Public Domain of JAL's & Stock Exchanges' website. The Company has
already clarified to stakeholders through regulatory filings with Stock Exchanges that
being a separate legal entity managed by a separate Board of Directors and team of
executives, there is no impact on the operational performance and financial well-being of
the Company.
In terms of Section 134(3)(l) of the Companies Act, 2013, except as
disclosed elsewhere in this report, no material changes and commitments are perceived to
affect the Company's financial position which have occurred between the end of the
financial year of the Company to which the financial statements relate and date of the
report and there has been no change in the nature of business.
29. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT AND MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
REPORT
A report on Corporate Governance as stipulated by Regulation 34(3) of
the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 forms part of
this Annual Report along with the required Certificate from the Auditors confirming
compliance with the conditions of Corporate Governance.
As required under Regulation 34(2)(e) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations
and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, the Management Discussion and Analysis
Report on the operations and financial position of the Company has been provided in a
separate section which forms part of this Annual Report.
30. WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY AND VIGIL MECHANISM
The Board has, pursuant to the provisions of Section 177(9) & (10)
of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its
Powers) Rules, 2014 and Regulation 22 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015, formulated Whistle Blower Policy and Vigil Mechanism for
Directors and Employees under which protected disclosures can be made by a whistle blower
and provide for adequate safeguards against victimization of Director(s) or employees(s)
or any other person who avail the mechanism.
The Company believes in the conduct of the affairs of its constituents
in a fair and transparent manner by adopting highest standards of professionalism,
integrity and ethical behavior. During the year under review, no reference has been
received under the Whistle Blower Policy and Vigil Mechanism for Directors and Employees.
The Vigil Mechanism-cum-Whistle Blower Policy may be accessed on the
Company's website at the link: http:// jppowerventures.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/
Vigil-Mechanism-cum-Whistle-Blower-Policy.pdf
31. INTERNAL FINANCIAL CONTROLS
The Internal Financial Controls, with reference to financial
statements, as designed and implemented by the Company are adequate. During the year under
review, no material or serious observation has been received from the Internal Auditors of
the Company for insufficiency or inadequacy of such controls.
The details pertaining to internal financial controls and their
adequacy have been disclosed in the Management Discussion & Analysis Report forming
part of the Annual Report.
32. PARTICULARS OF EMPLOYEES AND RELATED
DISCLOSURES
a) Statement showing details of employees as required under Section
197(12) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 5(2) and 5(3) of the Companies
(Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 has been provided in
Annexure-F (I) which forms part of this Report.
b) Information pertaining to remuneration to be disclosed by listed
companies in terms of Section 197(12) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 5(1) of
the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 have been
provided in Annexure-F(II) which forms part of this Report.
33. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Board places on record its sincere appreciation and gratitude to
various Departments and Undertakings of the Central Government, various State Governments,
CEA, UPPCL, MPPMCL, APTEL, CERC, UPERC, MPERC, Ministry of Power, Ministry of Coal,
Government of India, Financial Institutions, Banks, Rating Agencies, for their continued
co-operation and support to the Company. The Board sincerely acknowledges the hard work,
dedication and commitment of the employees and the faith & confidence reposed by the
shareholders in the Company.
|
For and on behalf of the Board |
|
Sd/- |
|
MANOJGAUR |
Place : New Delhi |
Chairman |
Date : 1st May, 2025 |
[DIN: 00008480] |